| DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD Po CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECUNDE
7034 8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1061
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: NR9952-14_
6 November 2014
pear Staff sergeant ary
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of thé Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 November 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative -
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 4 September 2014, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
cohcurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERS.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panei will be ‘furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. CO’ NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 20:4. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4757 14
You requested removing the fitness report for 2 March to 30 June 2013. , Tt is noted that CMC has directed filing in your record copies of your four letters of appreciation (LOA’s) dated 20 April, 4 May, 5 June and 12 June 2013, and modifying the contested fitness report by marking section A, item 6.a (*Commendatory Material”) and adding to section I (reporting senior’s SPArecced: an@ Additional Comments”) ‘Directed Comment: received four LOA’s for volunteer community service.” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9944 14
"; removing, from the justification for the mark in section G.3, “MRO received a 6105"; removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), Sect[ion] A, Item 6b: MRO received a 6105 for an alcohol related incident that occurred on 8 Nov 2013.” and removing, from section k.4 (reviewing officer's comments), *,imdicated in the 6105 counseling,”. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9928 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) , dated 20 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9951 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. After careiul and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material | error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9425 14
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 August 2014, and the advisory opinion from HQMC dated 19 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8611 13
— Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 2 June 2011 to 28 February 2012 by filing a Memorandum for the Record showing that section A, item 6.a (“Commendatory Material”) is marked, and including in section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”) “Directed Comments: Item 6A: MRO [Marine reported on] was awarded a Meritorious Mast and two Letters of Appreciation during this reporting period.” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9947 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8269 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...